There are very few truly bad exercises … just those that are bad in certain situations.
The classic sit-up is an exercise that definitely falls into that category.
“But I thought sit-ups were bad for your back!” I can hear the desperate cries already. While it’s true that the hip flexors do act as the prime mover during a sit-up, and that stress on the lumbar spine is probably greater than when you’re doing, say, a crunch, you can’t tell me that your abs aren’t sore the day after doing a hundred or so strict sit-ups!
I would contend that those with a ‘weak core’ or with back problems probably shouldn’t be doing sit-ups. But if you can hold a plank for a solid minute or so and you’re otherwise healthy and injury free, the sit-up could be a valuable addition to your workout routine.
I’m a fan of sit-ups because they work the abs through a full range of motion. The crunch is a partial range movement; we don’t squat partial range or do pull-ups partial range or do push-ups partial range; why do we train the abs through a partial range?
However, we can modify the sit-up slightly to get the maximum benefit from it.
Put a towel under the lower back or use an ab mat to start the abs in a stretched position and to support the lower back. The abs are worked through a full range of motion, the exercise is more effective, and everyone is happy!
Take a look at this article: Sit-Ups Redefined.
It expands on what I’m saying here and has some great digrams showing the biomechanics of a proper sit-up.
Enjoy!
Hey Forest, just saw your comment over on Problogger. Thanks homie! How's everything going for you?
Josh
It's going well man! Business is going great, my group classes are taking off … having trouble finding time to blog as much as I'd like, though. Gotta keep it fun though, right? Are you planning on going the the RKC 2 in February? I'm still debating …